U.S. War Merchants, Dare Play or Make Narrow Deals With the Master? ☻Checkmate!
U.S.War Merchants, ‘Insider Info’ to Narrow Deals? Who’s really playing dirty?
No ‘margin calls’ in weapons. Only ‘fire sale.’ But in country collapse ‘All’s Fair in Love and War.”
Americans play the markets, to “Be First. Be Smarter. Or Cheat.”
Iran, the U.S. made the first move. Moved you 10 spaces ahead, only to forcibly move you back. Next ‘direct talks,’ if not ‘First’, then Be Smarter…. Or risk walking in Ukraine’s path…
But be reminded, Element of Surprise wears many masks and makes many deadly moves.
Who better than War Merchants to broker ‘peace’ only to profit by War Machines. Recall my words, Englishman Archer points to ‘Trumper, The Honest Trader.’
West’s actions are predictable. Sell the idea of war. Arm friends, enemies and good neighbors.
Russia too has ‘good neighbors’ and friends. Right China, Korea and Iran?
China, you heeded my message to Putin. In holding the sword, think it a bird. Held “too tight, it chokes. Too lightly, flies away.”
Taiwan? ‘Let the chips fall where they may.’
Good Accountants know how ‘to get to heart of the problem’ right Lavrov? Access to ‘insider info’ or ‘margin calls’ American Politicians know when to ‘take their money and run.’
U.S. War Merchants, took out your “Soviet Military Power” playbook to play with China, DPRK, Russia, and Iran?
Blueprint layout is old but pretty clear, Checkmate! ☻
IRAN ↔ CHINA ↔ RUSSIA ↔ KOREA
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
u.s./nato
The text seems to critique the role of U.S. war merchants in global conflicts, suggesting their actions are driven by profit rather than peace. It highlights the strategic moves of the West, particularly in arming various nations, and warns against the potential consequences. The mention of China, Russia, and Iran indicates a broader geopolitical narrative. The chessboard metaphor suggests a calculated and predictable strategy by the U.S. and NATO. Are these tactics truly effective in maintaining global stability, or do they exacerbate tensions further?
The text is in English.
The dynamics of war and profit are deeply intertwined, as the text suggests. It’s alarming how historical strategies are recycled to manipulate modern conflicts. The idea of brokering peace while profiting from war machines is a chilling paradox. Nations must remain vigilant against such calculated maneuvers. Do you believe that peace can ever be achieved when profit is the ultimate goal?